![]() |
|||||
|
|
Home > News & Events > MITRE Publications > The MITRE Digest > | |||||||||||||||||||
Swift Travel: A Glimpse into the Future of Airport Information Management February 2006
Mr. Smith is concerned. Traffic was snarled, so he is arriving 30 minutes later than he had hoped for the flight he booked through Swift Travel. Worse yet, he is flying for the first time out of Big City Airport, which houses a specially designed terminal for Swift Travel customers, and he isn't familiar with its security check-in procedures. If its procedures are as cumbersome and time consuming as those used at other major airports, he will surely miss his flight. Airports and the U.S. government are putting more and more security measures in place to thwart terrorist acts. These measures have increased both costs for the airports and taxpayers and inconvenience for travelers. And an argument might be made that this inconvenience does little to increase security. Isn't a jumbled queue of passengers waiting to be screened just as tempting a target as a packed jumbo jet? "Everyone is keen to introduce new technologies and procedures to protect against perceived security threats," says Tom Berry, program manager for the Future Vision and Transformation department for the MITRE Corporation's Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD). "The problem is that nobody is looking at these technologies and procedures from a passenger's point of view. By examining passenger and cargo flow through time and space, you can envision a system that's both more convenient for passengers and more secure." MITRE believes that airport security procedures can enhance a passenger's travel experience, not detract from it. By envisioning innovations in information technology, airport security systems could be made not only less intrusive but more effective.
Current airport security systems force the passenger through bottlenecks such as a single screening point. This procedure has several drawbacks: it inconveniences the passenger, it presents a terrorist with but one obstacle to clear, and, as mentioned above, may inadvertently provide a terrorist with an even more inviting target than his original intent. What if an airport security system didn't force a passenger to follow its path but instead followed the path of the passenger? And what if the system didn't just conduct one security check but instead conducted multiple security checks, each one building a new layer of confidence in the passenger's intent? "No technology is infallible," explains Berry. "Facial recognition, name matching, bomb sniffing, fingerprinting—none of them is 100-percent effective. But if you combine a portfolio of technologies together in a security system that takes advantage of the passenger's flow through time and space, it may be possible to weave a much tighter, yet less obtrusive, security net."
The key to MITRE's airport security vision is information sharing. Government and industry for so long have been conditioned to view information as a proprietary product: Gather as much of it as you can and keep it as secret as possible. Likewise, consumers are cautioned to guard their personal information closely, lest it be abused by those who gain access to it. "Naturally, properly protecting access to intelligence and personal data are paramount issues. Passengers don't want to feel like their movements are being observed and analyzed every moment they are in the airport. One strategy to deal with these issues is to provide something in return for passengers who voluntarily share access to their personal information," says Berry. "Likewise, intelligence and security agencies want similar benefits for sharing their information. Our message is, 'There is value in connecting the information rather than protecting it.' Connect passenger information in a way that benefits both the passenger and the security providers. The higher the return for passengers, the more willing they will be to share the information needed for tighter security."
In environments where information is "stovepiped"—passed hierarchically through an organization while being kept from outside organizations—that information can serve only the needs of that one organization. This forces organizations to operate independently, duplicating efforts and using inconsistent or incompatible criteria for evaluation, even when the organizations are pursuing identical goals. By connecting systems within and between organizations, resources can be devoted to employing the information rather than gathering it. Consumers also should be willing to share their information, if in exchange they receive tangible benefits such as convenience and savings. "Executing a vision such as this is an enormous challenge," says Berry. "But we can already see it happening in the private sector in very small bits and pieces. Just look at how companies like Amazon or Google are drawing information from interactions with their customers and putting it together with external data sources. Over the long term, these companies and others will continue to provide value for customers by presenting them with the right information at the right time, in the right context and place. "Our goal is first to present to sponsors—such as the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Transportation Security Administration—a similar vision of how to link together individual technologies and information. We want to engage them in a conversation about how transportation security can complement rather than dominate the travel experience. And then we'll offer them our expertise in research, modeling, and simulation to implement that vision."
MITRE outlined its vision in a presentation to the Air Traffic Control conference in Maastricht, Netherlands, last year. The presentation, titled "Requirements and Tradeoffs: Securing and Growing Aviation," was made by Amr ElSawy, General Manager of CAASD. The presentation included a video co-produced by Berry and his colleague Greg Nelson that depicted Mr. Smith's experience with the fictitious Swift Travel company. ElSawy's presentation received an enthusiastic response. Caught between the terrifying possibilities of terrorist attacks and the burdensome realities of current airport security measures, airlines are watching both earnings and customer satisfaction drop. The Swift Travel model could be just the solution airports are searching for in order to keep their travelers both secure and satisfied.
Having presented its vision to industry, MITRE is working closely with both industry and government to understand how the Swift Travel model could emerge. But MITRE will not be content to help just the aviation industry overcome its information bottlenecks. MITRE is championing a "system of systems" philosophy that could benefit all its sponsors in many ways.
—by Chris Lockheardt Related Information Articles and News Websites |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Page last updated: February 28, 2006 | Top of page |
Solutions That Make a Difference.® |
|
|