About Us Our Work Employment News & Events
MITRE Remote Access for MITRE Staff and Partners Site Map

Home > News & Events > MITRE Publications > The Edge >

Understanding Customers' Technology Needs

By Jill Drury

Designing new technological solutions requires a thorough understanding of the customer’s requirements, tasks, workflow, work environment, and skill levels. Less obvious is the need to take into account the customer’s worldview, cultural milieu, and interactions. The subtle customs of an organization often are not brought to the attention of the designer who develops or acquires new systems.

To better understand a sponsor’s needs, MITRE often practices a class of anthropological observation techniques called ethnography. One such ethnographic method is contextual inquiry. Contextual inquiry focuses on observation in the workplace— to see the context in which technology is being used. Such observation is crucial in designing solutions that fit the customs of an organization.

The military is a prime example of an organization whose customs might not be immediately apparent to an outside IT developer. The military’s strict adherence to hierarchy, for instance, is well known, but the behaviors resulting from that adherence may not be. In MITRE’s many projects with the military, we have discovered that ethnography is a potent tool for understanding how to design solutions well suited to the military mission at hand. By carefully observing operations and asking questions, we can better understand why problems occur and how technology can help solve them.

One Near Failure, Two Solutions

MITRE was invited to attend a joint military exercise and asked to observe an unmanned aircraft verifying bombing accuracy. The unmanned aircraft, the Pioneer, was tasked to capture images of realtime bombing damage to buildings next to an airstrip in the northern part of the military reservation.

The Pioneer’s task almost ended in failure. Rather than flying to the designated airstrip, the pilots incorrectly guided the aircraft to an airstrip in the southern part of the reservation. Although a sergeant noticed the problem during flight, his efforts to redirect the Pioneer crew met significant resistance. At the last minute, the Pioneer’s operator recognized the navigation error and swung the camera north, just capturing the bombing event.

By closely observing the exercise, and conducting question and answer sessions following the exercise, MITRE uncovered two critical hurdles—one technological, one cultural—that led to the near failure.

The technological hurdle involved the Pioneer’s display systems. By relying on unaugmented video from the aircraft, the Pioneer’s display did not provide sufficient geospatial reference points; thus, the Pioneer pilot believed that the aircraft was located on top of a ridge behind the northern airstrip. When the sergeant observing the exercise was unable to locate the ridge in the video, he used a wall-mounted topographical map to confirm that the Pioneer was, in fact, nearing the southern end of the reservation. Because the combination of video and computer-based displays provided few cues regarding the surrounding terrain, the Pioneer operators were unable to develop accurate mental models of the aircraft’s location.

As a result of this experience, MITRE conducted new research in the design of display systems focused on providing operators with critical contextual information.

The cultural hurdle uncovered during the analysis of the Pioneer exercise involved the military’s adherence to hierarchical communication. After discovering the navigation error, a low-ranking imagery analyst was unable to obtain the attention of a higher-ranking Pioneer commander. As a result, a higher-ranking analyst had to walk over to the Pioneer commander to request that he address the issue.

This scenario revealed that technical and procedural designs must account for cultural artifacts, such as organizational hierarchies, to enable users to successfully achieve their missions.

Employing our expertise in ethnography and leveraging our close ties with our customers, MITRE is uniquely qualified to provide our sponsors with solutions that not only fit their technological needs, but their cultural needs as well.

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Summer 2008
Vol. 10, No. 3


Social and Behavioral Sciences


Introduction

Kerry Buckley and Lindsley Boiney


The Art of Enterprise Systems Engineering

Joanne DeVincent, Theda Parrish, and Craig Petrun


Social Contexts of Enterprise Systems Engineering

Jon W. Beard and Jo Ann Brooks


Covert Process, Overt Impact: The Role of Social Science

Elissa R. Allen


Understanding Customers' Technology Needs

Jill Drury


Understanding Arabic Nonverbal Behavior

LeeEllen Friedland and Dan Loehr


Modernizing Air Traffic Management: An Example of Future En Route Operations

Scott H. Mills


Building Autonomous Cognitive Models of Air Traffic Controllers

Steven Estes, Chris Magrin, and Frank Sogandares


Identity Groups in Decision Making

Lashon B. Booker


Enabling Trust and Performance in Military Virtual Teams

Eugene A. Pierce


Sensemaking Analysis

Ellen Powers


Exploring Social Bookmarking

Donna Cuomo, Laurie Damianos, and John Griffith


pdf icon Download this issue [614KB]

 

For more information, please contact Jill Drury using the employee directory.


Page last updated: October 8, 2008   |   Top of page

Homeland Security Center Center for Enterprise Modernization Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence Center Center for Advanced Aviation System Development

 
 
 

Solutions That Make a Difference.®
Copyright © 1997-2013, The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.
MITRE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.
Material on this site may be copied and distributed with permission only.

IDG's Computerworld Names MITRE a "Best Place to Work in IT" for Eighth Straight Year The Boston Globe Ranks MITRE Number 6 Top Place to Work Fast Company Names MITRE One of the "World's 50 Most Innovative Companies"
 

Privacy Policy | Contact Us