About Us Our Work Employment News & Events
MITRE Remote Access for MITRE Staff and Partners Site Map
Our Work

Follow Us:

Visit MITRE on Facebook
Visit MITRE on Twitter
Visit MITRE on Linkedin
Visit MITRE on YouTube
View MITRE's RSS Feeds
View MITRE's Mobile Apps
Home > Our Work > Technical Papers >

Endpoint Naming for Space Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking

July 2010

Loren Clare, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Scott Burleigh, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Keith Scott, The MITRE Corporation

ABSTRACT

Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) provides solutions to space communication challenges such as disconnections when orbiters lose line-of-sight with landers, long propagation delays over interplanetary links, and other operational constraints. DTN is critical to enabling the future space internetworking envisioned by NASA. Interoperability with international partners is essential and standardization is progressing through both the CCSDS and the IETF.

The DTN architecture, defined in RFC 4838, "uses a flexible naming scheme (based on Uniform Resource Identifiers [RFC3986]) capable of encapsulating different naming and addressing schemes in the same overall naming syntax." Although DTN was originally conceived with a space focus, as the technology underpinning an InterPlanetary Network (IPN), DTN has found increasingly broad application to military networks, wireless sensor networks, village networks, "pocket switched" networks, and peer-to-peer networks. In these latter contexts the generality of the naming structure permits the sophistication of "intentional naming" as recently proposed in Internet Draft draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming-00.

We argue in this paper, however, that when the application domain is limited to the space context a much simplified naming scheme is preferred: names may be essentially tuples (x, y) where x and y are finite non-negative integers identifying "node number" and "service number". This scheme was demonstrated in the DINET deep space flight experiment, and it is currently implemented on nodes in the NASA DTN Experimental Network (DEN). We discuss the rationale for this constrained naming structure, based on considerations of the space context. Alternative naming schemes may also be accommodated in a space DTN node, but we suggest that this simplified scheme should be the minimal naming mechanism that all space DTN nodes must implement.

A recommendation for a node number assignment strategy is offered which is bandwidth-efficient and fair to agencies/centers/projects using space DTN. Such assignments could be made by the Space Assigned Numbers Authority (SANA) now being established by the CCSDS.

View/Download Document

Additional Search Keywords

n/a

 

Page last updated: August 17, 2010   |   Top of page

Homeland Security Center Center for Enterprise Modernization Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence Center Center for Advanced Aviation System Development

 
 
 

Solutions That Make a Difference.®
Copyright © 1997-2013, The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.
MITRE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.
Material on this site may be copied and distributed with permission only.

IDG's Computerworld Names MITRE a "Best Place to Work in IT" for Eighth Straight Year The Boston Globe Ranks MITRE Number 6 Top Place to Work Fast Company Names MITRE One of the "World's 50 Most Innovative Companies"
 

Privacy Policy | Contact Us