MITRE
 
About Us Our Work Employment News & Events
MITRE Remote Access for MITRE Employees Site Map
Home > Our Work > Technical Papers >

Atmospheric Density Model Errors and Variations in the Ballistic Coefficient

July 2001

James G. Miller, The MITRE Corporation

ABSTRACT

Atmospheric density model errors are absorbed as variations in the ballistic coefficient or B term by the differential correction process. Unmodeled forces (e.g., geopotential terms) can also lead to variations in B. For satellites with small energy dissipation rates, observability problems also contribute to variations in B. Monte Carlo simulation is used to determine the accuracy of the variation in the ballistic coefficient in absorbing atmospheric density model errors. The standard deviation of the relative change in B from the least squares differential correction covariance matrix is shown to provide an estimate of the accuracy of the variation of B in absorbing atmospheric density model errors. The accuracy of the variation of B depends on the accuracy of the sensor measurements, the differential correction fit span, and the number of independent observations in the fit span. The length of the fit span is most critical for satellites with B term observability problems.

» Download Paper [PDF, 72KB]

Additional Search Keywords

atmospheric density, satellite drag, ballistic coefficient, special perturbations, differential corrections, covariance matrix, Monte Carlo simulation

 

Page last updated: July 27, 2001   |   Top of page

Homeland Security Center Center for Enterprise Modernization Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence Center Center for Advanced Aviation System Development

 
 
 

Serving as Architects of Information Advantage.™
Copyright © 1997-2008, The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.
MITRE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.
Material on this site may be copied and distributed with permission only.

 

Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Boston Business Journal Best Places to Work 2007 Computerworld Best Places to Work in IT 2005-2007 Fortune 100 Best Places to Work 2002-2008