When Systems are Simulations: T&E, VV&A, or Both?

This paper provides a brief introduction on the use of modeling and simulation (M&S) and the importance of the credibility of that M&S when it is used to support system acquisition.

Download Resources


PDF Accessibility

One or more of the PDF files on this page fall under E202.2 Legacy Exceptions and may not be completely accessible. You may request an accessible version of a PDF using the form on the Contact Us page.

This paper provides a brief introduction on the use of modeling and simulation (M&S) and the importance of the credibility of that M&S when it is used to support system acquisition. A previous paper, The Relationship of VV&A to T&E (Allen et al. 1997), is briefly reviewed, followed by an introduction of a new example of M&S use. This example cites the recent development of systems that are themselves simulations. As new acquisition systems, they require traditional test and evaluation (T&E). As simulations, they require verification, validation and accreditation (VV&A) to ensure credibility. The main text of this paper examines key commonalties between these two processes. It provides insights into how T&E and VV&A requirementsí can be met with reduced cost and risk, to the optimal benefit of the user. A case study is provided and conclusions presented.